The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not have any fact between the E main points operated by the victim along with G, and that the person called K, who used the name of P, with a Handphone of the Defendant, drinks with G with the Defendant, and then handles the drinking by the Defendant as if the Defendant had fled and fled.

Therefore, although the defendant did not commit the crime of this case at all, the court below erred in finding the defendant guilty.

2. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below is as follows: ① A consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that “A person wishing to drink on the day of the case is clearly the defendant, the defendant is active and active in the name of ordinary P, and the statement is very clear and specific; ② The telephone conversation and text message between Q Q’s number and G’s mobile phone number are several times from June 3, 2013 to 04:35 on June 3, 2013; ③ there is no evidence as to the fact that a person other than the defendant used the defendant’s mobile phone during the above period; ④ The fact that K’s mobile phone number “R” and “S” are used by other persons than K on the day of the defendant’s assertion, and the defendant cannot at all confirm the substance of K’s mobile phone number on the same day; ⑤ The defendant was aware of the fact that he was using the Defendant’s mobile phone number on the first 20th day before and after the investigation.”