logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고법 1967. 2. 16. 선고 66나2026 제10민사부판결 : 상고
[위자료등청구사건][고집1967민,103]
Main Issues

The case recognizing that a public official was not an illegal act in performing his duties.

Summary of Judgment

The crime of this case was committed by Nonparty 1, a first-class soldier, and a first-class non-party 1, away from his place of service during the guard hours and was committed as a personal principal-related relationship. Not only did he did not intend to perform his duties in the supervision of the above non-party, but also it cannot be deemed that the so-called "the act of performing his duties" or "the act of performing duties" was extremely closely related thereto.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 2 of the State Compensation Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 67Da702 delivered on May 30, 1967 (Supreme Court Decision 8610 delivered on May 30, 1967, Decision 2(56)69 of the State Compensation Act

Plaintiff, Appellant

Plaintiff 1 and five others

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Korea

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Central District Court (66Ga3533) of the first instance court

Text

The part against the defendant in the original judgment shall be revoked.

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

All the costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff, etc.

Purport of claim

The attorney of the plaintiff et al. shall pay to the plaintiff 2 and 3 the amount of 30,000 won for each of the plaintiff 4, 20,000 won for the plaintiff 5, 195,510 won for the plaintiff 6, 311,620 won for the plaintiff 6, 105,510 won for the plaintiff 7, and 5% for each of the above amounts from August 24, 1965 to the date of full payment.

The judgment that the lawsuit cost shall be borne by the defendant and the declaration of provisional execution are sought.

Purport of appeal

The defendant litigation performer, etc. shall revoke the part against the defendant in the original judgment.

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

All the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiff et al.

Reasons

According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's evidence Nos. 3 and 4's non-party 1's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 9's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 1's counter-

Judges Kim Yong-chul (Presiding Judge)

arrow