The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant made a confession and reflects all of the crimes, the amount of damage caused by each of the frauds in this case does not amount to be performed at all, the victim wants to punish the defendant, the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, including the previous department of the court below, the sentencing in consideration of equity in the case where the judgment is rendered simultaneously with the previous convictions in the court below is expected to have been made at the court below, the new circumstance where the change of the sentence of the court below was not presented in the court below was not presented, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, means and methods of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However) On the 3rd page of the judgment of the court below, the pertinent Article of the Criminal Procedure Act is a clerical error in the pertinent Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the criminal facts of 1.0, and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act of 10 is clear that it is a clerical error in the “Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and each of the “the choice of imprisonment” under Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.