The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (hereinafter “fine 1,500,000”) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of this case is the case where the defendant steals the victim C's goods that had the defendant stay in his own house by cutting off his own house, and the defendant acquired pecuniary profits equivalent to the taxi expenses by boarding the taxi without the intention or ability to pay the taxi expenses, and the defendant seems to have committed each of the crimes of this case without any particular reason, and even though there was a history of criminal punishment such as punishment due to the same crime, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in addition, even though there was a history of criminal punishment such as punishment due to the same crime, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, degree of damage, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., it is not

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the costs of the trial by the court below and the party shall be borne by the defendant pursuant to Articles 191 (1), 190 (1) and

[4] However, Article 329 and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act of April 10, 2014, which applies to the crime in the judgment of the court below, "Article 2 of the Criminal Act of April 22, 2014" and "Article 329 and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act as to the crime in the judgment of the court below," and "Article 329 of the Criminal Act as to the crime in the judgment of the court below, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act," and "Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014)" are each clerical error in the judgment of the court below, and thus, correction thereof shall be made pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.