A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 1828]

1. An insurance fraud-related criminal defendant and G together are those who live together with the Defendant, and the Defendant is a space between H and his work.

Defendant, G, and H conspired to operate a high-priced external motor vehicle, etc. and intentionally passed through a place where a road is damaged (one name: one person) while driving the high-priced external motor vehicle, etc., and then file an application for the payment of compensation with the competent local government, etc. by destroying the wheelchairs of the wheels of the motor vehicle, etc., the Defendant, G, and H shall first pay the insurance money with the insurance company, and shall receive the insurance money

At around 01:00 on February 19, 2013, Defendant, G, and H had already been aware of the damage of the surface on the roads adjacent to the Suwon District Court underground streets located in the Young-si, Suwon District Court, Suwon-si, through a prior response company, etc., but the Defendant was driving an Icras vehicle, G was driving the Icras vehicle on the back seat, and H was driving at a certain speed with a certain speed while driving at the back seat, and H was driving the vehicle at the back seat, and applied for the payment of compensation to the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

Defendant, G, and H intentionally caused a traffic accident as above, and then filed an application for the payment of compensation as if the local government had been responsible for the accident, and received total of KRW 4,958,380 from the victim’s frank Fire (ju) in terms of automobile repair expenses, hospital treatment expenses, etc., Defendant conspired with G, H, etc. in collusion with the victim’s insurance company in 11 times in total, as described in attached Table 1 in attached Form 1, respectively, and acquired insurance proceeds of KRW 100,624,360, respectively.

2. The Defendant is unable to obtain a full-time loan from an employee in a normal manner due to the denial of marriage and the impossibility of being married with G by having two children through a false marriage report. However, in collusion with the name of the working lender, the Defendant is unable to obtain a full-time loan from G.