1. Claims against the Defendants and appeals by the Plaintiffs, Defendant D, and H, which were changed in exchange in the trial.

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding paragraph (7)), and therefore, it is acceptable to accept this case by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part (excluding paragraph (7)).

【The part to be removed, added, or deleted】 Each “AH” of the 3rd 13th and 4th 3rd

Then, “in the middle of the 15th place” is added to “the total area shall be reduced to 908 square meters (3,001.6 square meters) through land partition substitution.”

Part 9 of the 9th 11 states that "the right to demand a payment shall be confirmed," "The right to demand a payment shall be transferred to the plaintiffs in proportion to their shares, and each of the above assignment of claims shall be notified to the Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City."

The confirmation of the first place of conduct 8, 14, and 13 shall be understood as “transfer, etc.”

In view of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 8, 9, and 10 of the 15 pages “A No. 9” in the statement of evidence No. 8, 2, 4, and 9 of the evidence No. 8, the entire purport of the pleadings is shown, Defendant J and F, among the land subject to the dispute of this case, at a successful bid in the Daejeon District Court AD voluntary auction procedure, said “K, L, Q and R.”.

If so, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant D and H are justified within the scope of the above recognition, and each of the remaining claims against the above defendants and the claims against the defendant J are dismissed as it is without merit. Since the part of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the claim for the registration of ownership transfer against the defendants is justified as it is in conclusion with the conclusion, the appeal against the plaintiffs, the defendant D and H is dismissed as it is without merit, and all of them are dismissed as it is without merit, and the claims against the defendants that were changed in exchange at the court of first instance against the defendants are dismissed in its entirety. The part concerning the claim for the confirmation of the right to request the payment of deposit against the defendants in the judgment of the court of