logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.01.24 2013고정1324
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B B B B B CA110 two-wheeled motor vehicles.

On June 3, 2013, around 09:20, the Defendant had a duty of care to look at the right side and accurately operate the steering direction and brakes, and prevent accidents from occurring in the middle school in the direction of the middle school in the middle school in the direction of the middle school in the direction of the middle school in the direction of the middle school.

Nevertheless, due to negligence, the victim C (50 years of age) who was crossing the stop signal on the right side of the crosswalk was found late, and the victim was received from the front part of the Defendant's wheels and exceeded the floor, resulting in the victim's injury, such as the removal of the body part of the unknown body part, which requires about 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer in C (Simplified traffic);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates of doctor DNA preparation;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Punishment for Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that there is no criminal history of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; there is no negligence falling under the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; although comprehensive insurance is not covered, insurance proceeds therefrom are paid to the victim because it is not covered by liability insurance; the victim was negligent in crossing without permission in violation of the signal; and the Defendant’s age and living environment are considered.

arrow