logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.19 2020고단2143
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Where the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a typon vehicle B with 300 wheels.

At around 14:40 on March 4, 2020, the Defendant driven a son, and made the front road of the “Dcafeteria” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C turn to the left at the south of the Ejudo from the jurisdiction of the Ejudo to the left as Gangnam.

It constitutes an intersection and a place where people can easily move because there are many surrounding points. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a two-wheeled vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed prior to the left turn, to properly take into account the situation of the front and right-hand traffic, and to proceed safely.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected to turn to the right without delay, he was found to be the victim F (I, 23 years of age) who was coming to the right right from the left side of the last bed and stopped immediately, but the victim's bridge and the body side of the victim who was walking up on the side of the last bed and stopped later. However, the defendant received the front part of the above wheels.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A statement of victim of the F;

1. The name of a witness;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Guidance data, certificates of medical treatment, and medical certificates;

1. In relation to the instant accident, the Defendant and the defense counsel are negligent on business in relation to the instant accident.

It argues that the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered injury or injury.

However, according to the CCTV images that were duly adopted and examined in this court, the following circumstances, namely, ① according to the CCTV images that had been taken on the face of the accident, the victim, who was the victim immediately before the accident, stopped the letobane and was sponsed with the wheels of the Defendant’s driving after approximately 1 seconds, but the Defendant is the Defendant.

arrow