A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 2, 2012, the Defendant against the victim C told the victim C at the front and French coffee shop in Pyeongtaek-si D, saying, “If he/she has made an investment in the bonds, he/she would make an objection to KRW 300,000 per month of KRW 10 million.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the profit or return the investment money because he thought that he will use it for personal purposes, such as living expenses.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 30 million won from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On May 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F at the head of the District Education Office of Pyeongtaek-si G Branch Office located in Pyeongtaek-si, stating that “When investing in the bonds in this case, he/she would raise interest on the bonds of the Gu, he/she would raise an interest of KRW 200,000 per month of KRW 10 million.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the profit or return the investment money because he thought that he will use it for personal purposes, such as living expenses.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 42 million from the injured party to the Defendant’s agricultural bank account, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. On May 31, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H that “When the insurance premium was paid, if the circumstances were to have been extended to KRW 7 million, 5% per month shall be paid, and the interest shall be paid in the tin month shall be paid in advance, and the interest shall be paid in advance at the interest rate.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant belongs to this.