logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.12 2018고단3016
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. From February 22, 2018 to 22:55 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) within the “E restaurant” of the victim D’s operation in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around 20:5 to around 22:05 on the same day; (b) the Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with the Dong Fee B, was dissatisfied with the victim who was in the process of drinking alcohol and was asked to have the victim talk early; (c) the Defendant was able to ask the victim for a consultation; (d) the Defendant’s head; (d) the sthemee lease substance on the table was tight; and (e) the stheme lease substance installed on the table of the Defendant was tight; (e) the victim was frighted with the beer; and (e) the customers using the place were able to get the victim out of the place by avoiding the disturbance by speaking other customers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's operation by force.

B. On February 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) within the G police box located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul around 22:20 on February 22, 2018, the Defendant: (b) deemed the victim I, who was in office as a guard of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station G police box, to be “weak, sweak, sweak, and sweak sweaked by sweak”; and (c) was arrested in the act of committing a crime, and (d) was heard by seven residents, including H.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Defendant B, at around 22:10 on February 22, 2018, performed drinking together, within the “E cafeteria” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

A complained of the dissatisfactions that he was arrested as the victim of the disturbance, and asked him to show CCTV to the owner, who was reported 112, and was called out by the J from the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Gangnam Police Station G police box in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, which was called out, led him to be subject to the removal from the police officer. On the left hand, the police officer carried out the breath of the J with the unclaimed hand, and threatened him with the booming of the boom.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Each police statement made to D, I, and J;

1. A H statement;

1. Complaint;

1. On-site photographs; 1.

arrow