The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the cash withdrawal scheme that withdraws the amount of damage deposited by the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the

A. On June 18, 2015, upon the foregoing public offering, the Defendant 1 sent a phone call to the victim C on or around 08:20 on June 18, 2015, and “The Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office is an investigator of the Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and C’s personal information was leaked and the victim was 30 persons, and C must prove that the victim was the victim.

In the end, the victim had the company bank account opened, had the victim enter the account number and password of the above company bank account by accessing the website of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office, and transferred KRW 20 million from the company bank account under the victim's name to the company bank account (D) around 11:18 of the same day without authority.

The Defendant received an order from the employees of Bosing 11:32 on the same day to withdraw money deposited in the said account from the employees of Bosing 1:32 on the same day, and withdrawn KRW 20 million from the new branch of the Industrial Bank of Korea located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, the Bank of Korea withdrawn KRW 20 million from the new branch of the Bank of Korea at 291 on the same day to the employees of Bosing

B. On June 18, 2015, upon the above public offering, the Defendant 1 sent a phone call to the victim E on June 10:19, 2015, and “The Seoul Central District Prosecutor Inspection Fund, investigators G, and the head of the Gu. The current I is currently the investigation of the Defendant 1 in the name of 2015 investigation 3009 I using a passbook.

In order to protect the account, an enterprise bank opened an account at a bank and transfers money in another account. "The victim shall open an enterprise bank account and shall make the victim open an enterprise bank account on the fake site of a fake Public Prosecutor's Office (J).