A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2016, at around 04:40 on May 2, 2016, the Defendant received a violence report and was dispatched from the police officer E, the police officer of Mapo Police Station D belonging to Seoul Mapo Police Station, and became at one time at the face of the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of the above police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) is [the scope of recommendation] interference with the performance of official duties (from June to January 4) in the basic area (the scope of suspension of performance of official duties) [no person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] is recognized by the defendant as committing the instant crime and his mistake is divided. The defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime shall be determined by taking into account the various factors of sentencing as set forth in the arguments of the case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence.