The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Although the Defendant had no desire as stated in the facts charged, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by misunderstanding the fact.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in this case is a person who operates a coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1th floor C.

The victim D is a certified intermediary who is in contact with the above shopping mall C and manages the business E E which is delegated by F.

In order to secure the actual area of the above shopping mall E before the early April 2019 when the dispute over the above shopping mall E and the area of the shopping mall E was occurred, the defendant was placed in front of the above shopping mall E, while the tenant and the construction personnel, etc. were observed, the victim who was on the boundary line with the above shopping mall E in order to secure the actual area of the above shopping mall E shall be placed in the actual area, and the victim who was on the boundary line with the above shopping mall E shall be placed in the right of no person in the last year, such as the mentally ill person, the year in which the mentally ill person, and the year in which the head of the management office was installed, and shall be raised anywhere, the two years, the two years, the two years, and the low age in the last two years, the police report in the same year, the second two years, the police report in the same year, and the second two years, and the second years in the last two years.

The age of . Where we reach the age, we would like to see who is the subject of the real estate, and we would like to see this knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, anywhere in the subject of this land, knife and knife, knife the knife, knife, knife, and knife, knife, where in the real estate, knife, knife., knife, where in the subject of the real estate, knife., knife., knife.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

B. The lower court’s determination is consistent with this Opinion from the investigative agency to this court.