logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.03 2017구단70185
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The details of the disposition are as follows: short-term stay visit (C-3) on September 8, 2016 of the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the date of September 12, 2016 of the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds of recognition of the decision of rejection of the decision of April 21, 2016 of the date of application for objection that no sufficient fear of refugee status recognition could be recognized: the fact that there is no ground of recognition of the decision of rejection of the decision of April 21, 2017 of the date of application for objection, Gap evidence 1 through 4, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Republic of Naria (hereinafter referred to as "Naria").

The father of the plaintiff's father's ancient village "Ahra" has a custom of sublime scoo as a tree, and the plaintiff was the president in charge of the above tree as a tree.

After the death of the Plaintiff, the father of the Plaintiff had succeeded to the president position according to custom, but the father of the Plaintiff, who is a senior assistant, refused this.

As a result, the plaintiff's father was unable to perform an alcoholic beverage that makes the plaintiff's father die, and eventually the plaintiff's father died around 2015.

After the Plaintiff’s father died, village senior citizens demanded that the Plaintiff succeed to the president position, and if they refuse to do so, they threatened the Plaintiff’s death by using alcohol, such as the Plaintiff’s father.

The plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea, regardless of Mariaia, because he/she is able to die, such as his/her father.

As such, the Plaintiff is likely to go back to Naria, and thus, he/she should be recognized as a refugee.

B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act recognizes that refugee status may be respected on the ground of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group or political opinion.

arrow