logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.20 2018구단61379
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. During the process of the disposition, the Plaintiff’s short-term visit of sojourn status (C-3) on December 10, 2016, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “instant disposition”) was applied for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”), and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole, as of December 21, 2016, of the date of the application for refugee status recognition as of December 21, 2016, the decision of May 10, 2017: The fact that there is no dispute as to the rejection of the decision of the Supreme Court on March 21, 2018 as of the date of the application for objection that was made on June 20, 2017; the fact that there is no ground for the rejection of the decision of the Supreme Court; the

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Republic of Naria (hereinafter referred to as "Naria") of the Republic of Naria and Earia.

The father of the Plaintiff was the president at “B”, a high-ranking village.

The father of the plaintiff died in around 1993, and the plaintiff, South Korea, has to succeed to the president position.

However, the plaintiff, who is a senior Do governor, refused to do so.

As such, it threatened the plaintiff by assaulting the young young children, setting the plaintiff's house, etc.

Accordingly, the plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea regardless of Austria.

As such, if the plaintiff returns to Naria, he/she is likely to also threaten from the original point of view of the native village, and thus, he/she should be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who, due to such fear, could not return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.” (ii) the aforementioned evidence and evidence set forth in subparagraph 3-1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8-1, 2, 9, 9, 9.

arrow