The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the defendant's grounds of appeal (the fact-finding) has the fact that the defendant was guilty of the victim's clothes, but there is no causation between the defendant's act and the victim's "s chestbox". The court below erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged.

2. Circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, including witness E, G, H, J, and D's statement in each court below's original judgment, and fact inquiry results, i.e., the victim consistently asserts from investigative agencies to the court below that he/she met the breast part or the stove part of the victim, ② the witness G, H, I, and J appear in agreement with the purport that the defendant was at the time of the victim's breast part or the stove part of the victim's breast part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the defendant's stove part of the case.