logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 03. 14. 선고 2013두25436 판결
(심리불속행) 사실과 다른 세금계산서로 원고의 선의ㆍ무과실이 인정되지 않음.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2013Nu17215 ( November 14, 2013)

Title

The Plaintiff’s good faith and without fault is not recognized as a tax invoice different from the facts.

Summary

In full view of the fact that the Plaintiff, while running oil wholesale and retail business for 18 years, appears to be well aware of the actual state and risk of material transactions, the Plaintiff’s good faith and without fault may not be recognized in full view of the false description of the shipment slip, the purchase price at a lower price than the market.

Related statutes

Article 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act Special Cases concerning Time of Supply for Goods and Services

Cases

2013Du25436 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA Energy Corporation

Defendant-Appellee

The superintendent of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2013Nu17215 Decided November 14, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The judgment of the court below and the appellate brief all of the records of this case, but the appellant's ground of appeal is not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or it is recognized that there is no reason. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow