A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the part of the victim B (the age of 17).

On February 14, 2014, at the defendant's house located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 23:20 on February 14, 2014, the defendant expressed the attitude that the victim threatened the victim with the danger of the body of the victim, such as the victim's coming to the house and the sound of closing the entrance becomes a serious problem, and the Maerber ker ker ker, which is an object dangerous to the chemical of the chemical of chemical of chemical of chemical of chemical of chemical of chemical of the victim, and threatening the victim as knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick, and the victim threatened the victim with the dangerous object of the victim's coming to the fore knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick kn, and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of excessive photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant’s crime of this case is not likely to pose a threat to excessive and threatening the Defendant’s age, which is a dangerous article, to the victim.

However, according to the statement of the victim and his mother, the victim and his father considered the victim as the father from the date of the elementary school student, and the defendant took care of the victim as well as his father. In particular, when he does not drink, the victim was well examined. The crime of this case also seems to require that the defendant was under the influence of drinking, and that it is necessary to give the defendant an opportunity to lead a normal family life once again by sentenceing suspension of execution, in addition to taking a course in alcohol treatment lectures, and that the defendant's wife D is now a smooth family life together with the defendant and the victim.