logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.09 2016구합73115
입찰참가자격제한처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Since the introduction of the bus exclusive lanes control system using IT technology in 1995, Seoul has continuously promoted the introduction of the intelligent traffic information system. In 2004, the illegal stopping unmanned control system was introduced, and thereafter, the establishment of the system for the additional installation of the controlled CCTV and the establishment of the system, and the implementation of the performance improvement work every year for the improvement of performance through the replacement of the worn-out equipment.

B) The performance improvement project is the main content of purchasing various devices necessary for unmanned control, such as control cameras, electronic sign boards, and operating caps, and also includes telecommunications construction for installing such devices at the site and electrical engineering works. (c) The operator who constructed the bus exclusive control system in Seoul Special Metropolitan City is the Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Building Information Technology Co., Ltd”) and the Habthe Telecom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Habthe Telecom System”), and the operator who constructed the illegal parking stop control system is the Plaintiff and the Han EsM Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea EsM”).

The status of bidding for the establishment of the unmanned control system and the performance improvement project ordered by Seoul Metropolitan Government since 2008 shall be as follows:

Division: (1) The bid price of KRW 194,842,00 in KRW 676,192,00 in KRW 730,00,00 in KRW 456,89,30,000 in the bid price rate of KRW 930,00 in KRW 456,890,000 in KRW 190,30,000 in 201; (2) the bid price of KRW 727,08,000 in the Korea-Japan Information Technology Project in 201; (3) the bid price of KRW 87.7% in 207,00 in 207,00 in 201; and (4) the Plaintiff’s construction of the Telecommunications System, Plaintiff’s construction of the Telecommunications System, Plaintiff’s construction of the Telecommunications Technology in 194,842,000 in 20,000 in KRW 190,300,00.

order was made.

arrow