logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.12 2017나64330
건물인도
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. All of the Plaintiff’s claims, including extension and additional claims in the trial.

Reasons

1. The basic facts of the claim: ① the Defendant entered into a commercial building lease agreement (hereinafter “former lease agreement”) with the owner C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) to lease all one floor of the instant real estate as indicated in the attached list used as a customary market store around April 11, 2009, with the period of lease from May 30, 2009 to April 29, 201, with the period of lease from May 30, 2009 to April 29; ② the Defendant and C did not express their intent to terminate the lease even after the termination of the term of the former lease agreement, and thus, the former lease agreement each year.

4. The fact that C has been implicitly renewed on a one-year basis on each 30th anniversary of each 30th anniversary of each 30th anniversary of each 30th anniversary of each 30th anniversary of each 30th anniversary of each 30th anniversary of each 30th anniversary of each 30th 40,000 won of each 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2014 by requesting the Defendant to prepare a low-end contract allowing C to receive old age pension (hereinafter “new lease contract”), and that D and the Defendant, on each 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 30,000,000 won of each 8th 1st 1st 1st 20,000 won of each 2nd 1st 1st 2016.

arrow