logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.08 2014가합10879
임대차보증금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 6, 200, Plaintiff B entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the condition that the land of 1,600 square meters and 380 square meters of the land of 4 lots in Ansan-gu, Jeonyang-si and the land of 380 square meters of the above ground during the lease period from March 20, 200 to February 19, 2004, the lease deposit amount of 10 million won and the monthly rent of 170 million won (payment on March 20, 200) were leased to the Defendant on March 20, 203.

B. On January 10, 200, the Plaintiff B and the Defendant changed the lease agreement that was concluded on March 6, 200, as above, and agreed that the Plaintiff B shall lease the Plaintiff’s KRW 2.5 million increased by KRW 8 million (payment on January 25, 200) from January 10, 202 to January 9, 2005.

C. On May 30, 2004, the plaintiffs and the defendant added the plaintiff A to the lessee of the changed lease contract around January 10, 2002, which was revised around January 10, 2002. In addition, the plaintiffs agreed to pay the plaintiff the rent of 2.2% per annum for the rent of 8 and 3,447 and 380 square meters per annum for the above ground (hereinafter "the lease object of this case"). The lease period from May 30, 2004 to May 29, 2008 shall be extended from May 30, 2008, the lease deposit shall be KRW 150 million, and the rent of 2.5 billion shall be paid to the defendant on May 26, 2000 (payment on May 25, 200, respectively, but if the plaintiffs delay the rent of 2.05 billion won per annum for the following month, the plaintiff shall pay the rent of this case to the defendant on May 36, 20006.

The Plaintiffs and the Defendant agreed on May 31, 2007, and the Plaintiffs returned the leased object of this case to the Defendant on the same day, and the Defendant was above to the Plaintiffs on June 2007.

arrow