Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 4.5 million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the representative director of B Co., Ltd., a second and second export company.

The export of goods shall report to the head of the relevant customs office on the items, size, quantity and price of the goods concerned and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree.

Nevertheless, around October 1, 2009, the Defendant exported 7 of the Jung-gu Incheon Port Dong 1-18 to 5 of the Incheon Main Customs Office, which is located in Jung-gu, Incheon, the goods No. 8704-21-1020, and reported as if he exports 5 of the goods No. 32010, the goods No. 32010, the goods No. 8703-21-800, the goods No. 32010, and then exported 5 of the goods No. 32010 through the Incheon Port on October 20, 2009.

In addition, from June 11, 2009 to March 22, 2011, the Defendant exported or sealed the amount equivalent to KRW 99,015,00 in total on five occasions, as shown in the list of offenses, and the total domestic wholesale price of KRW 9,00 for automobile 9,00, in total, different from the relevant export goods, or exported them without filing an export declaration.

2. Defendant B, at the above date, at the above time and place, the above Defendant A, the representative director of the above Defendant, committed a violation regarding the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. A written accusation;

1. Each written appraisal;

1. Each investigation report (in the case of the goods listed in the [Attachment 5], each defense counsel asserts that there was a legitimate report since it was reported on the next day of departure. However, the above goods are merely those loaded and exported into a used motor vehicle, which is not a new one, into a motor vehicle transport-only vessel, and it is obvious that the report was not made before departure, so it does not interfere with recognizing the Defendants’ violation of this part of the Customs Act.] statutory application shall not interfere with

1. Article 269 (3) 1 and 2, and Article 241 (1) of the Customs Act (the export of declaration and export of goods of each other, and the selection of fines for negligence).