Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, along with E and F, operated a mutual adult game room, “H Gameland,” in the name of Sinpo City from April 23, 2015 to May 12, 2015, and operated the said game room in the name of Sinpo City E, and installed 30 game machine for “Yland” and 20 game machine for “Yebaba” game for which youth is not permitted to use the said game in the above game room, and made them use the said game work, and made them use the game work by making them use of the said game work, and after making them accumulate the game score obtained by using the said game work in the custody certificate, they request exchange by paying 9,000 won, an amount calculated by subtracting 10% of commission per 10,000 won from the game score.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with E and F for business exchange of results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Two times the suspect examination of F by the prosecution;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect E (second time);

1. Each statement of statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the real estate lease contract, such as photographs (the face pages of shooting on H gameland (15.05.07.07) , field photographs, and video CDs (2 copies), such as H gameland and the face pages;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Selection of and Promotion of the Game Industry, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The part not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) of the provisional payment order;

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant, who manages the building of the “H Gameland” located in G, and even after being aware of the fact that he/she intended to operate an illegal game site, such as the facts stated in the facts charged in the judgment of F, A, and E around April 20, 2015, the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that he/she had intended to operate the said building, assisted F to use the said building and assist F to commit

2. The defendant's assertion does not exceed the building indicated in the above facts charged.