Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

From August 7, 2013 to March 21, 2014, the Defendants installed 26 game software “niveker” and 40 game software in the above game room respectively, and accumulated the game score obtained by the unclaimed customers using the above game software in the custody certificate, and introduced them to F in the event they request money exchange, and F in the case of presenting a certificate of custody of unclaimed customers with the game score accumulated, F in the manner of paying 9,000 won, an amount calculated by subtracting 10% per 10,000 won from the game score.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange the exchange of results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer's statement concerning G;

1. Reports (on-site verification, such as transshipment) and money exchange photographs;

1. Report on investigation (as to the execution of a warrant for seizure, search, and inspection), and the site photograph of warrant execution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as an investigation report (Attachment of suspect A mobile phone evidence analysis data), and money exchange-related message;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Defendant B: Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who suspended the execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his wrong, the fact that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime in 2008, but it appears that the Defendant was not the actual owner at the time, the age, character and conduct, family relationship, etc. of the Defendant

1. Probation Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Matters concerning the promotion of the game industry; and