logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2012.01.13 2011고단2039
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반방조
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 2.5 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine not exceeding nine million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B From June 7, 2010, a person who actually operates a game room in the trade name of the Won-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan, and D (hereinafter referred to as D) who was a co-defendant who was separate from the defendant A and the public trial is the employee of the above game room.

1. Defendant B

(a) No one shall provide game products with the contents different from those classified by the Game Rating Board for distribution or use;

From December 22, 2010 to December 22, 2010, the Defendant installed 22 computers in the said game site. Many unspecified customers who found in the said game site access to the “Sone Star” game site, and offered games with contents different from those deliberated by the first Game Rating Board, such as (i) additional automatic performance function; (ii) additional example and performance function was added; (iii) providing multiple IDs per head; and (ii) providing a game with a face-to-paid cash directly in a pre-paid card; and (iii) providing customers with a game with contents different from those deliberated by the first Game Rating Board, such as providing game games exceeding 300,000 won per day.

(b) No person shall engage in business of exchanging, arranging exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

Nevertheless, the defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a), proposed that many unspecified customers acquire game money through the game such as the above paragraph (a) through the name influence and exchange of 10% fees per unit to 9,000 won.

2. Defendant A provided customers with a game product different from the content classified by Defendant A, such as having provided customers with a game product for use, and aiding and abetting customers to exchange game money acquired among the games, at the same time, at the same place as set forth in Article 1(1) and at the same time and place as set forth in Article 1(1).

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow