logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.03.16 2016고단2254
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, fraud against the victim C on October 7, 2016.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In general, the telephone finance fraud organization is an organization that deceives a large number of unspecified people by deceiving them to investigative agencies, the Financial Supervisory Service, banks, etc., and deceiving them by means of personal information leakage, criminal cases, loan suspicions, etc., and then acquires money from victims.

The role of the instant telephone finance fraud organization is shared with the roles such as the “general responsibility” in charge of organic communications between the point organizations, the “ Call Center” in which the server is located overseas and phone calls to the domestic people, the “ receipt of passbooks” in which the head of the Tong is recruited to commit the crime, the “management liability” in ordering the withdrawal of the amount of damage deposited in the head of the Tong, and the “collection liability” in which the victims are misrepresented with the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, and the “collection liability” in exchange for arresting the victims. It is operated in the form of a thorough system in preparation for arrest.

The Defendant, as seen above, was willing to take part in the singishing telephone fraud planned by the non-offenders of Chinese nationality, and the Defendant and D conspired in the order of each other to serve as the role of “collection liability” and the role of delivering fake identification cards and fake documents necessary for misrepresenting the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, and E to serve as “collection liability”.

Pursuant to the aforementioned division of roles, D entered Korea with a fake identification card and a fake document from China around September 28, 2016, and D returned from Seoul to Busan Station on October 6, 2016, and the Defendant and D returned back to Busan. On October 7, 2016, the Defendant and D received delivery of KRW 16 million from the victims of phishing from Busan to Busan Station on October 7, 2016, and the Defendant received KRW 500,000 from D on October 7, 2016. D received KRW 16,00,000 from the Defendant on October 7, 2016 to the Seoul Station, and from around October 7, 2016 to the Seoul Station, D received from D on October 7, 2016 to the Defendant’s identification card and document from China on October 7, 2016.

arrow