The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is a person who is an employee of D, who is a company selling and buying a secondhand vehicle in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

A. On July 15, 2013, the Defendant forged private document: (a) used a computer located in the foregoing D office for the purpose of using it for the transfer of the name of E Kanknche; (b) recorded the name and resident registration number of “F” in the column for the personal information of the transferee of the vehicle transfer file; (c) stated the name of “F” in the name of the recipient of the document form; (d) printed out the form of the document form; and then arbitrarily sealed the name of “F” on the right side of the transferee’s signature.

B. On July 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) submitted a copy of the motor vehicle transfer certificate in the name-based name F’s name-based transferee F’s name, and exercised one copy of the motor vehicle transfer certificate, which is a private document on the proof of the above F’s name, to a public official of the Cheong-si Office, who was unaware of the fact that it was forged by the Cheong-si’s civil petition office at 11, Guang-si, Guang-si, which was located in the Doang-si,

2. Determination

A. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion is a withstanding withstanding, and as a result, the Defendant and the Defendant would sell EKanche vehicle to a purchaser introduced by other mid- and long-term ladler G, and received KRW 1.7 million from G, and conducted a procedure for changing the name on behalf of the purchaser, in accordance with the personal information of the purchaser notified by G.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the fact that the defendant prepared a copy of the F’s automobile transfer certificate under F’s name without F’s consent is recognized.

In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, witness G’s legal statement, Defendant’s submission evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the fact that the Defendant as a mid- and long-term withdr, the buyer introduced by other mid- and long-term withr G would sell EKanche vehicle and received KRW 1,70,000 from G, actually, a purchase price of KRW 1.7 million.