Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was under the influence of alcohol so that he was in a state that he lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions.

1. On May 7, 2017, at around 00:10, the Defendant destroyed the above taxi so that the market price is unrepaired by taking part in the main taxi and the roof section of the instant taxi, such as cutting off the etroke and the etroke, which were listed on the main taxi, by drinking, from the 2nd ambro-ro, Busan, Nam-gu, Busan, and then going to the Csi owned by the Hyundai taxi Co., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

2. On May 7, 2017, at the same place as before and after around 00:25, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the maintenance of order by committing assault, such as spitation, etc. on his face, to the head of the police box affiliated with the Busan Southern Police Station D police box, which has observed and prevented the above situation, by stating that “the police officer should spite spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spits.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for B and E;

1. The defendant argued to the effect that, in relation to the part that interferes with the performance of official duties, the investigation report (on the suspect's speech and behavior, etc.), investigation report (on the spot condition and the attachment of a photo of the damaged police officer's damage), investigation report (related to attaching a photo of the damaged vehicle and securing the black image of the damaged vehicle), investigation report (the attachment of a black image of the damaged vehicle) / [in relation to the part that interferes with the performance of official duties, the defendant spits the defendant's hand in the process of leaving the police officer's hand at the time so it is too detailed and open in the past, so the defendant's act is dismissed as it does not go against social rules, and thus the illegality of the defendant's act is excluded.” The defendant's act is acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, and even according to the defendant's argument, the defendant's act does not constitute a justifiable act.