Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a seeable Car C.

At around 1:20 on July 9, 2014, the Defendant proceeded at a speed that is not visible from the center distance to the large market distance.

Since there are pedestrian crossings, in such cases, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who can reduce speed and live well the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected his duty on the front day, and neglected to proceed as it is, instead of negligent negligence, received a half of the victim F (the 57 years old) to build the crosswalk as the front part of the passenger car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, which requires approximately 16 weeks of treatment, such as minculization of the balls right-hand pulver.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Accident site and vehicle photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. The scope of the applicable statutory provisions for criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act: The applicable sentencing range recommended by the sentencing guidelines from January to May of the imprisonment without prison labor: The final sentencing range recommended by the sentencing guidelines / [the type of crime] there is no type of injury or injury of the standards for general traffic accidents among traffic crime groups [the scope of recommendations] [the scope of recommendations] the basic area (from April to October) of the sentencing guidelines: Where serious injury not serious injury occurs, and where falling under the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: there is no recommendation of suspension of execution [the main reasons for suspension of execution] by the guideline for sentencing of a considerable amount of deposit [ there are no positive reasons for suspension of execution [the main reasons for suspension of execution]]. The serious reflect, the defendant's age, considerable negative reasons for deposit of money: