1. On October 2014, 2014, based on the executory exemplification of the payment order issued by the Defendant against B, the Suwon District Court 2014 tea 13213.

The plaintiff asserts that the items listed in the separate sheet are not B but B, and the defendant sought non-permission of compulsory execution based on the executive title against B. Thus, according to each of the evidence Nos. 6, 7, and 8, the plaintiff purchased each item in the separate sheet Nos. 4, 5, and 7 may be recognized. However, it is insufficient to recognize the fact that each item listed in the separate sheet Nos. 4 and 5 is owned by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable within the scope of seeking non-permission of compulsory execution against each item listed in the separate sheet Nos. 4, 5, and 7, and it is so decided as per Disposition.