beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
The defendant is 140,00 won by fraud to C who is an applicant for compensation, and D who is an applicant for compensation.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On December 8, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and two years of suspended execution. On May 26, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months by the Gwangju District Court as a special larceny and the sentence of suspended execution became invalidated, and the sentence of suspended execution was paroled on October 28, 201 during the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju Prison. However, on February 29, 2012, the Defendant was detained in the Gwangju Prison on February 27, 2012.
[2013 Highest 4036] Defendant, F and G have gathered to prepare living expenses through so-called Internet goods fraud, and the Defendant provided an account to be used for committing a crime, G colored victims who wish to purchase goods, and F conspired to act as if they sold goods to victims.
1. On July 30, 2012, the Defendant, F, and G made a false statement to the effect that “to purchase the Internet H site 505” by accessing the Internet H site using smartphones from the location of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the effect that the Defendant, F, and G would have contacted the victim to sell the counter-mail by visiting the victim.
However, the defendant, F, and G did not have any intention or ability to sell them because they did not have a ELF reflect 505.
Nevertheless, the "2013" written indictment from the victim seems to be a clear clerical error.
7. 31. The Defendant received 670,000 won from the Defendant’s name credit account (J) and acquired it by fraud.
2. On August 1, 2012, Defendant, F, and G are expected to purchase a scooter by accessing the Internet NAVK by using smartphones in the French-dong, Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter referred to as “Scoo-dong”).
“The victim made a false statement to the effect that he/she would report the victim Lane to the effect that he/she will contact the victim and sell scooter.
However, the defendants, F and G are the scooter.