logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.06.13 2013고단1680
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

A. Defendant A is the representative director of a limited liability company C (hereinafter “C”) and the actual operator of a limited liability company B (hereinafter “B”) who obtained permission for trucking transport business.

On November 2, 2006, the Defendant forged the notification of alteration to the freight truck permission items in the name of G operator of the Jeonnam-do Freight Truck Association by inserting and copying the letter of "general type" to F, which is a truck for special purpose, permissible to be supplied, using the notification of alteration to the item of permission items of trucking transport business, which was issued through a normal procedure in advance in the traffic department of the Youngnam-gun Cancer-gun, Yongnam-gun, Yongnam-gun, the Seoul Metropolitan Government, by using the notification of alteration to the item of permission items of trucking transport business.

After that time, the Defendant, by submitting a false notice of repair to a public official in charge of the registration of the Yeongdeungpo-gun Civil Service Office, registered F as a general truck with the restriction on supply, and actually increased the number of general trucks, etc. without permission for change, and operated trucking transport business by the end of July 2013 without permission for change, even though 15 general trucks and towing special vehicles, such as the list of crimes listed in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the attached Table, have increased the total number of general trucks and towing special vehicles, etc.

B. Defendant B, the Defendant’s employer A, the Defendant’s employer.

In the same manner as described in paragraph (1), the defendant's business was increased by more than 10 times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form (1), and the trucking transport business was operated without obtaining permission for change.

C. Defendant C, the Defendant’s employer, A, the Defendant’s employer.

In the same manner as stated in paragraph (2), the trucking transport business shall be operated without obtaining permission for change even though the defendant's business has increased more than five times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form (2).

arrow