logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.13 2016구합21062
사업전부정지60일 처분의 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's successor's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the intervenor succeeding to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Special Metropolitan City Mining Co., Ltd. (the trade name on November 13, 2015 is changed to “Plaintiffs (Plaintiffs)”) which is a company operating automobile transport business of general area cargo with the head office in the Gwangju Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City, a report on the scrapping of the light forest by a limited liability company, shall file a report on the scrapping of the general-use truck with the general-use truck, the supply of which is limited to 27 vehicles as shown in the attached Table 1 list (registration of transfer and takeover, and details of borrowing and lending vehicles), and registered the scrapping of the vehicles in accordance with the receipt of the report, or acquired the vehicles registered for the scrapping of the vehicles by such means.

(hereinafter referred to as the “type of the registered vehicle” in the attached Table 1 list shall be the “each of the instant vehicles” and the “registration of the instant vehicle” in total of the registration of the scrapping of the said vehicle.

On October 22, 2014, the head of Gwangju Metropolitan City Si/Gun/Gu issued a disposition to the Plaintiff on the grounds that “The head of the Si/Gu of Gwangju Metropolitan City has registered the change to a general truck with limited supply of each of the instant vehicles, which is a special-purpose truck that is allowed to be supplied as the instant registered act.” This was a disposition to suspend the entire business (hereinafter “instant disposition”) for a truck (42) owned by the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 19(1)2 of the Trucking Transport Business Act (hereinafter “ Trucking Transport Business Act”) and Article 5(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26251, May 26, 2015; Presidential Decree No. 26251, May 26, 2015; hereinafter “former Enforcement Decree of the Trucking Transport Business Act”).

C. The Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Gwangju Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission on November 13, 2014, but the said commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on May 22, 2015.

arrow