1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

2...

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: (a) considering the reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that "the plaintiff has contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages as seen earlier," and (b) above, the defendant's liability is limited to 50% of the defendant's liability in consideration of this point, since the plaintiff's error is difficult to be deemed to be greater than the defendant's error; (b) the defendant's liability is limited to 10,000,000 won of lease deposit which the plaintiff has not recovered by the defendant's negligence (=10,000,000 x 50% of the amount x 50% of the amount of the complaint of this case x the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case from December 8, 2017 to June 21, 2019." (c) The defendant has the duty to pay 4% of the amount of money calculated by the court of first instance with the exception of this case's judgment concerning the existence or scope of performance obligation.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance which partially different conclusions are unfair, the part against the plaintiff in the judgment of first instance which partially accepted the plaintiff's appeal and ordered the payment of the above recognized amount to the defendant. The plaintiff's remaining appeal is dismissed as without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.