1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiffs ordering payment is revoked.

The defendant is respectively against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff B went out as a candidate for the E-superintendent election implemented D, and the plaintiff A is his father and son.

B. Plaintiff B was charged with violating the former Local Education Autonomy Act (amended by Act No. 10046, Feb. 26, 2010; hereinafter “former Local Education Autonomy Act”) by establishing an election similar agency in the process of the above superintendent’s election activities, filing false reports, and providing money and valuables in relation to election campaigns. Plaintiff A used private documents by altering and altering private documents, and Plaintiff A was charged with violating the former Local Education Autonomy Act by providing money and other valuables in relation to election campaigns. Defendant A was charged with committing a violation of the former Local Education Autonomy Act.

C. On October 5, 2009, the Daejeon District Court rendered a judgment to suspend execution of each of the above punishment for two years from the date when the judgment became final and conclusive (hereinafter “the judgment of this case”). D. The judgment of this case was rendered that each of the above punishment was suspended for two years from the date when the judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Although the plaintiffs and the prosecutor appealed against the judgment of this case, the Daejeon High Court dismissed the appeal by the plaintiffs and the prosecutor on January 22, 2010, respectively. The plaintiffs appealed against this, but the Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeals on May 13, 2010, and the judgment of this case became final and conclusive on the same day.

E. On May 12, 2012, the period of suspension of the execution of the sentence finalized in the instant judgment was expired, and on June 14, 2010, Plaintiff B terminated the execution of the said sentence finalized by the instant judgment in the Daejeon Prison.

F. The staff in charge of the Sucheon-gu Office in Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office was found guilty of violating the Public Official Election Act, and each of the above punishments became final and conclusive, and it was entered in the convict list.