Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who works as a home-based engineer B, and is in the same family-based spouse D who works in a home-based company such as the victim C (47 tax, female). On June 15, 2017, around 23:40 on the family of the victim of building E in Gwangju-si building F, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s head part by her hand on the ground that the Defendant had the victim injured his spouse while drinking together with the victim’s husband at the home of the victim of building E in Gwangju-si building F, and the Defendant had the victim injured his spouse G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, H and I;

1. The witness C and G respective legal statements;

1. 112 The defendant asserts that there is no assault against the victim.

However, the circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, i.e., ① the Defendant’s wife who was at the present site, i.e., the Defendant’s wife made a false statement in this court that “the victim satisfed “at the time when the victim satisfs satisfs satisfs satisfs satisfs sat,” and that the victim’s external invasion is an immediate natural reaction

The witness D and H, a family member of the victim at the scene, stated that “the defendant was present at the time of the victim’s head” and the victim made a statement in this court that “the defendant was in custody of the victim’s head.” The victim also made a statement that “the victim was in custody of the victim’s head.” In addition, the witness I had a consistent part of the victim’s statement, such as the victim’s statement that “the victim was in assault of the victim’s head immediately after the instant case.”

The victim made a false statement with I to obtain evidence at the latest time. The victim made a false telephone conversation with I in order to obtain evidence at the latest.

In full view of the facts stated in the report sheet 112 on the day of the instant case, the fact that the Defendant used the victim’s head at one time as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment is difficult to see, and the Defendant used the victim’s head at the same time.