logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.12.05 2014고합114
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million due to the crime of causing property damage in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, and applied for formal trial on July 22, 2014, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million in the same court, but appealed in the judgment and continues in the appellate court in Daegu District Court. On April 25, 2014, the summary order of KRW 2 million due to the crime of intimidation was issued in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch Branch on April 25, 2014, and the summary order of KRW 1 million due to the crime of intimidation was issued in the same court on August 1, 2014, and a request for formal trial on the whole of the above summary order is pending in the first trial.

1. Around December 12, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine on July 22, 2014, as seen above, due to the crime of destroying property and damaging the glass window of the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D in the Gu-U.S. Si, and around December 25, 2013, the crime of intimidation threateninging the victim in the “E restaurant” and the crime of interference with business that obstructs the business of the said “E restaurant” on or around May 9, 2014, the Defendant was punished by a fine on the charge of interfering with the investigation or trial of the criminal case in which the victim reported the criminal investigation team and provided a report of the investigation team and attempted to take a retaliation against the damage statement.

From March 6, 2014 to March 23:24, 2014, the Defendant found the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D (the age of 53) from March 6, 2014 to December 00:12, the Defendant expressed an attitude of threatening the victim to harm the victim with respect to the investigation or trial of the criminal case as above, for the purpose of retaliationing the victim’s provision of the investigation report and statement of the investigation team. The victim was known of the victim’s “the victim’s provision of the investigation team and statement of the investigation team.” The Chewing year was known to the victim. Around July 6, 2014, the Defendant made it possible for the victim to take a fine of 12 million won to be deducted. If the internal amount was KRW 6 million, the Defendant would be 60 million,000,000,000 won. However, it appears that it would not be deemed that the victim would have been subject to a duty of taxation.”

B. The Defendant committed a crime around March 12, 2014.

arrow