logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.10 2016나62618
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. In the first instance court’s trial scope, the Plaintiff paid the goods to the principal lawsuit, and the Defendant claimed damages as a counterclaim. The first instance court dismissed all the Plaintiff’s claims on the principal lawsuit and the Defendant’s counterclaim, and the Plaintiff appealed only to the part of the claim on the principal lawsuit, and thus, the subject of the judgment by this court is limited to the Plaintiff’s claim on the principal lawsuit.

2. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: the court's explanation of this case is to delete "(the plaintiff shall not be 's 's 's '' to 7')" under Section 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance falling under the scope of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where Gap's 18 to 26 evidence which is not sufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion as additional documents submitted in the court of first instance, and thus, it is identical to the reasons for the part falling

3. As such, the plaintiff's main claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow