1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The plaintiff filed a claim for damages due to interference with the collection of premiums at the first instance court, and the defendant filed a claim for delivery of a building due to the expiration of the lease term due to a counterclaim and the return of unjust enrichment due to illegal occupation. The court of first instance dismissed all of the plaintiff's claim on the principal lawsuit and accepted part of the defendant's counterclaim.

Accordingly, since only the plaintiff appealed against the main claim, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the plaintiff's main claim.

2. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The defendant has been operating the building of this case up to now" in the 3th to 6th of the judgment of the court of first instance; "the plaintiff continued to operate the building of this case after the decision of the court of first instance was rendered, and ordered the defendant to order the above building after the decision of the court of first instance," and the 13th of the 13th of the 13th of the 15th of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 15th of the 15th of the 2nd of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 7th of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 1st of the 2nd of the 420th of

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the first instance court sharing this conclusion is justifiable. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.