logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.19 2016고합61
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강간)등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The request for the attachment order of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The facts charged and the summary of the request for an attachment order 【Defendant’s and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) are the victim’s external relationship with the victim D (here, E).

1. The Defendant, around January 2013, 2013, was locked with his family members at the Defendant’s house located in Mine-si F around the new wall, and the Defendant spawned with her fingers inside the panty of the victim (the age of 11 at that time) who was locked by another family members, and forced the victim to refuse and resist, and forced the victim’s spawn and panty, she went off the victim’s body by inserting her sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound, and raped once.

2. Around January 2013 (the following day of the above paragraph 1), the Defendant was locked with his family at the location of the above paragraph 1, and the Defendant was forced to leave her spanty and panty ties by inserting her spanty in the victim’s panty that other family members were locked by the Defendant, and forced to leave her spanty and panty spanty, even though she refused and resisted by the victim, and raped once by inserting her spanty into the part of the victim’s spanty.

3. Around August 10, 2014, the Defendant was locked with his family members at the Defendant’s house located in Mine-si G around the new wall on August 10, 2014. While other family members were locked, he was able to put her hand in the panty of the victim (the 12 years old at that time) who was locked by the Defendant, and forced the victim to refuse it and resist, the Defendant exceeded the victim’s her good will and panty, and the victim’s body was frightd one time by inserting her sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound.

4. The Defendant, around August 11, 2014, was locked with his family at the location of the foregoing paragraph 3 around the new wall, and the Defendant was locked by inserting her hand into the victim’s panty where other family members were locked by the Defendant, and forced the victim’s her panty and panty even if the victim refused it and resisted against it.

arrow