logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2019.01.17 2018누11607
입찰참가자격제한처분취소 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases or addition. Thus, this case is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third-party 1 conduct is as follows.

Article 27 (1) 8 of the Enforcement Decree of the State Contracts Act, Article 76 (1) 2 (a), etc. of the Enforcement Decree of the State Contracts Act provides that "the nine-month entry into the National Treasury" of Chapter 5 of Chapter 4 shall be " December 19, 2016." The five pages 9 through 6 shall be as follows. The defendant shall not supply cement according to the instant contract, and the plaintiff shall be notified on December 23, 2016 that "I will not perform the instant contract." At the same time, I shall request the defendant to verify that I will be able to perform the instant contract, and it shall be difficult to request the defendant to verify that I will be able to perform the instant contract, and shall submit the supply plan to the National Treasury by December 28, 2016, stating that I will not perform the instant contract until 20 days after the date of delivery, and if I will not complete the supply plan by 20 days after the date of delivery."

However, this case.

arrow