logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2009. 05. 14. 선고 2009두3200 판결
공급시기 이전에 교부받은 세금계산서를 사실과 다른 세금계산서로 본 처분의 당부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2008Nu19316 ( October 20, 2009)

Title

The propriety of any tax invoice delivered prior to the time of supply, in a false tax invoice different from the fact

Summary

If an input tax deduction is allowed solely on the basis that the tax invoice delivered prior to the time of supply is confirmed to have been supplied and paid within the same taxable period, any inconsistency in the refund occurs even if the tax invoice is issued after the time of supply, unlike the case where the tax invoice is delivered to the purchaser.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Related statutes

Article 3 (Taxable Period)

Article 9 (Transaction Time of Value-Added Tax Act)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow