Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants, each of the above two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 13, 2015, the Defendants alleged that they suffered traffic accident damage within the E-district located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-si, and Defendant A was under investigation while under investigation, Defendant A was under the influence of alcohol and was breadous and heavy.

At this time, the 112 patrol police officer, who was the 112 patrol police officer of the same district group, demanded to be fluorized in several times, taken a mobile phone in order to evidence the Defendants' disturbance, the Defendant A laid the above F's arms to damage the floor of the mobile phone, and Defendant B attempted to take the police officer by gathering the chairs inside the district.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on their duty in the earth.

2. The Defendants’ fraud need to do so from July 14, 2015 to July 03:00 of the same day, to 06:20 of the same day, the G Victim H managed by Daegu Northern-gu Seoul Northern District.

At the main point, the alcoholic beverage and the alcoholic beverage were ordered.

However, the Defendants did not have any intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

The Defendants, in common, deceiving the victims as above, and jointly received 420,000 won per 420,000 won per 420,000 Do, including 2 disease, 3 disease disease disease, 4 disease disease, 4 disease disease, 420,000 won per 4 disease, from the victims, and acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of each police statement made to F, H and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the E District Work Place;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1), 30, 347(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime and the choice of punishment, respectively, Articles 136(1), 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Defendants among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of suspended execution: Crimes No. 2 (Fraud) for the reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 1) (amended by Act No. 1) (amended by Act No. 1) (amended by Act No. 1) (amended by Act No. 1) (amended by Act No. 16304, Jun. 1, 200) (amended