Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 15 million won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. The co-principal defendant B is the representative director of the victim (the state F) E in Busan-gun, who is engaged in the business management and fund management of the above company.

Defendant

B entered into a false contract as if Defendant A were to manufacture and supply gold punishment from (ju)G whose representative is Defendant A to use the company’s funds for personal purposes, and paid the funds of the victim company with the funds of the victim company, and some of the above payments were used by Defendant A and the part was collected by Defendant B to embezzled the funds of the victim company by receiving a return. A

Defendant

B Around January 12, 2010, entered into a false contract with Defendant A to be supplied with SBC 1250,000 won including surtax 4,290,000 won. Around January 12, 2010, Defendant B paid 42,950,000 won to Defendant A’s account in the name of the bank account in the name of the victim company in the name of Defendant B, which was in the custody of Defendant B, from January 14, 2010 to Defendant A’s account, and embezzled 42,90,000 won in total twice.

B. Around April 5, 2010, Defendant B entered into a false contract with Defendant A to be supplied with SBC 1800,000 won including surtax 46.2 million won, and Defendant B embezzled KRW 46.2 million through three times by paying each of the following amounts: (a) from an enterprise bank account in the name of the victim company in which Defendant B was in custody for business purposes, from April 5, 2010 to an account in the name of Defendant A; (b) KRW 2 million on April 8, 2010; and (c) KRW 24.2 million on April 12, 2010 to an account in the name of the victim company in which Defendant B was in custody for business purposes.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and embezzled the total amount of KRW 89.1 million of the funds of the victim company that Defendant B had been in custody on duty.

2. On December 2012, Defendant A (a) retired from office for reasons such as the failure to comply with B’s opinion, etc., Defendant A (i) retired from office for the said state F, which he had been working at the time, and (ii) was dissatisfied with that that would not properly treat Defendant B, and (iii) there remain grounds for returning the embezzled money to B, such as the said paragraph (1).