logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.12.12 2018가단7636
원인무효에 의한 소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. The defendant shall share 17/23 of each land indicated in the separate sheet to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Each of the lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) was owned by the network C. On December 18, 1968, the said C succeeded jointly to the network D, the head of the household and the head of the household, the network E, the heir of Australia, G, the selected party A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) to the Plaintiff, the other children, and the network H and network I (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

B. On September 24, 1980, the network E obtained a false letter of guarantee and a written confirmation that he/she purchased each of the above lands from the network C or the network J, which is the part of the network. On September 24, 1980, the network E completed the registration of ownership transfer under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094, Dec. 31, 197; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”) on the ground of sale as of February 15, 1968 in the name of the above E.

C. Accordingly, other co-inheritors, including the Plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against the deceased E seeking the cancellation of ownership transfer registration (hereinafter “instant cancellation lawsuit”) with respect to the shares exceeding 17/23 of the inheritance shares of the deceased E (6/23) by the Jeonju District Court of 90Da9010, and on November 15, 1990, the above court rendered a favorable judgment against the other co-inheritors, including the Plaintiff, that “The deceased E shall implement the procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration with respect to the shares of 17/23 of the land out of the nine parcels of land outside the instant land, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around December 9, 190.

However, while other co-inheritors, such as the Plaintiff, etc., did not register the cancellation of ownership transfer registration as to the share of 17/23 of each land of this case based on the above final judgment, the network E completed the registration of ownership transfer for each land of this case to the Defendant, who is his spouse, as the former District Court Kim Jong-dong Office, No. 32319, Dec. 29, 2005.

E. Meanwhile, the network D.

arrow