A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 on March 14, 200, the Defendant: (a) in a video room near Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu, and (b) in fact, from around August 1997, the Defendant had D (here, October 29, 200) that had come to death on the premise of marriage on the premise of marriage; (c) had no intention to marry with E (here, 26 years of age) who became aware of the company’s business around October 16, 1999; (d) had a woman to believe that “if there was a home situation, he would be married,” and made the woman believe that he would have sexual intercourse with a woman who has not been habitually sexual intercourse, and had sexual intercourse with another woman under the pretext of marriage for eight times in total as described in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements that correspond to part of the facts stated in this Court by the defendant;

1. Each statement consistent with the facts set forth in this Court by the witness E, F and G;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the accused prepared by the public prosecutor, which corresponds to the facts contained in the judgment;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to make statements consistent with the facts indicated in the judgment, among the statements made to E, F, and G in preparation of the judicial police assistant;

1. The point of view as stated in the pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 304 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the addition of punishment stipulated in the [Attachment No. 8] No. 8 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes (the heavier punishment)