The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant, at around 22:00 on March 14, 200, committed a sexual intercourse with the victim E who became aware of the company’s business around 16, 1999, on the premise that he was married from around 1997 to the Gangnamnam Station located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, while the Defendant, from around 22:0 on August 14, 200, committed a sexual intercourse with a woman who had no habitual sexual intercourse with a woman who was sexual intercourse with a woman who was sexual intercourse for eight times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes, in spite of no intention to marry with the victim E who was aware of the company’s business around 16, 199.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Article 304 of the Criminal Act to this part of the facts charged, but the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that “a person who, under the circumstance of marriage, induces a female who had not been habitually engaged in sexual intercourse by deceiving him/her to engage in sexual intercourse” under Article 304 of the Criminal Act is against the Constitution, thereby retroactively losing its validity pursuant to the proviso of Article 47(2) of the former Constitutional Court Act (amended by Act No. 12597, May 20, 2014).

Thus, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.