Defendant

A cooperative shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

The amount equivalent to the above fine shall be paid to the cooperative.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The defendant cooperative (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant cooperative") is a cooperative that constitutes seven business places, including C, and is established for joint projects, such as services for members, as well as the creation, management, and operation of public facilities, which employs four full-time workers and operates a wastewater treatment plant, etc.

Defendant

A is a director who actually manages the safety and health of workers belonging to the defendant union and acts for the defendant union.

1. In the places where workers might fall down, as the end or opening part of the work launching and passage, the business owner shall install a strong structure with sufficient strength protection measures, such as safety railings, fences, vertical fall prevention networks, or covers;

Nevertheless, Defendant A did not take protective measures to install safety risks, etc. to prevent falling at the end of the wastewater treatment plant reaction and the stairs concentration tank.

2. In the event that there is a danger of electric shock by the workers' contact with or approach to the charging portions of electric machinery, apparatus, or electric route due to work, passage, etc., the business owner shall maintain a structure outside the charging system so as not to be exposed to prevent the electric shock;

Nevertheless, Defendant A did not install three of the powder boxes in the wastewater treatment plant, which are closed to prevent electric shock hazards.

3. The business owner shall install strings, soundings, slots, etc. on the parts where workers are likely to face danger, such as machine motors, turning strings, light, swimmings, flars, labels, and chains;

Nevertheless, Defendant A did not take protective measures to install a protective coverr in the Belgium 2.

4. Defendant A, who acts on his behalf, did not take safety measures for the prevention of disasters as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.