The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (two months of imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of probation, and eight hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and his mistake is divided, and that he agreed with the victim.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant has been sentenced to a fine and a suspended sentence for a total number of times, and that there was a record of being punished several times as violent crimes, and that the liability for the crime was not less exceptionally imposed in light of the form and method of the crime in this case, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, etc., and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.