logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.18 2014가단32174
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 20,590,098 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from November 15, 2014 to December 18, 2015.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is engaged in rubber sheet manufacturing business, etc. with husband C with the trade name of “D,” and the Defendant is engaged in the manufacturing business of synthetic resin with husband E with the trade name of “F.”

B. The Plaintiff manufactured and sold sets to the Defendant. As of August 5, 2014, the Plaintiff agreed to pay the outstanding amounts of KRW 20,591,098 as of August 5, 2014, E would pay the outstanding amounts of KRW 500,000,000 on August 30, 2014, KRW 10,000,000 on September 20, 2014, and the remainder within October 2014.

(A) Evidence Nos. 5 and 2 (hereinafter “this case’s agreement”). [The grounds for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments No. 2]

2. The allegations by the parties and the determination thereof

A. According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 20,591,098, which is not paid to the Plaintiff. 2) The Plaintiff is also obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 2520,000,000,000,000, in addition to the amount of the set, and the amount of KRW 1,161,000,000,000, in total, and the amount of KRW 3,330,00,000,000, and the amount of delay damages.

However, in light of the fact that at the time of the preparation of the instant agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant have confirmed the outstanding amount of transaction between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as KRW 20,590,098 (at the time of the conclusion of the instant agreement, it is recognized that the Plaintiff was found to have discovered that the Plaintiff was omitted by itself after the preparation of the instant agreement and that the Plaintiff was stated additionally), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the entries of the evidence Nos. 3, 4, 6, and 10 in addition to the above KRW 20,590,098, in addition to the above KRW 20,590,000, in addition to the above KRW 20

3. Therefore, the defendant from November 15, 2014, which was the day following the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order sought by the plaintiff against the plaintiff as well as KRW 20,591,098.

arrow